Site logo

Roy the Boy's betting guide to Japan

NEWS STORY
09/10/2013

"Tony Abbott is a misogynist, sexist, homophobic pr**k, a bully, a racist, a liar and is the worst Prime Minister in Australian history."

These are the words which introduce a Facebook page entitled: "Tony Abbott - Worst PM in Australian History". Within days of the page's creation, and before Abbott had even been sworn into office, it had received more than 166,000 "likes". Some endorsement.

I concur, the internet is accommodating to a culture of abuse and group stalking. Forums and chat sites generally operate as open sewers. Blogs epitomise a celebration of closed minds. The communications revolution, the rise of social media, is blatantly a backward step in mental development and objectiveness of the human kind. A champion of small mindedness maybe, but I like this forthright way of doing things.

There is another option, good old fashioned dispassionate journalism. But, in an apparent two-runner race, it is the complete and utter absence of the latter within specialised F1 media circles which endears me to community cybersphere and opinionism.

Let me elaborate, a day after Felipe Massa's departure from Ferrari was announced a self-compromising magazine editor, a bigot, wrote a wonderfully constructed piece on how the Brazilian driver could "hold his head high when looking back on his career with the Italian team". Sympathy was the underlying theme, facts were not in the equation.

Here's facts: M. Alboreto (55 races), E. Irvine (49), C. Regazzoni (34), S. Johansson (31), R. Barrichello (30), C. Amon and G. Berger (27 apiece) all garnered ugly losing streaks but F. Massa's 81 consecutive starts without a win comprehensively trumps them all. Similarly of the last 40 races both Ferraris have completed Massa has not finished ahead of his teammate on a single occasion.

In my book his engineer, Rob Smedley, about to be released from his demoralizing futile role, should take a career change becoming a columnist where his freely stated truths such as "Fernando is faster than you," would be embraced.

Simply put I appreciate such honesty and find journalists writing "let's hope he [Massa] finds another team where he can prosper" every part as offensive and puke-worthy as the very worst the Internet forums could throw at me. Such antics are not journalism, they are not even examples of diplomacy, they are gimp-masked, hand-cuffed submissiveness.

The people who compile these stories and recent similar pieces of tat such as "Mark Webber's transfer to sports car racing is Formula 1's loss" and state habitual loser "Brazilian Rubens Barrichello will be a welcome return to the sport" are akin to independent MP's horse trading in the corridors of power. The type that would give up at least three of their strongest beliefs should they be allowed to compromise all of their other strict values in a quest to mollify those worth knowing.

Speak the truth, state the blatantly obvious. Do not compromise yourself for the sake of personal relationships or a fear of alienating yourself from teams and drivers. It is notable most of F1's televisual pundits and a sizeable proportion of the F1 media fit the description of former driver or team boss. These old boys with badges are oblivious to their real clients and customers, the readers and viewers, who deserve better than mushroom farming... being kept in the dark and fed shit.

The pursuit of excellence through technology is the distilled spirit of Formula 1. Its shortcoming, its compromise, is the discarding of genuine driving talent (invariably through their lack of money) and the retention of those blatantly lacking in ability at this highest echelon. The reasoning is not the biggest mystery since crop circles first appeared on our TV screens but not only are F1 media outlets unwilling to expose the truth they promote the myths.

Rubbish you can bet on
And so to betting opportunities this weekend: Massa has declared he is now "racing for himself". That makes no difference, he cannot possibly win, he's useless.

Webber, out-qualified by his teammate 14 times and beaten 13 times from the same 14 races this year (perfectly in line with his form of recent seasons) is described as 'a very unlucky driver'. It's a complimentary way of declaring he has absolutely no chance either. That leaves just five pilots in competitive cars who can conceivably win in Japan.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Editor, 09/10/2013 12:02

"On behalf of Roy the Boy:

The –220 is simply the running total of our bets this season combined. In short, on my recommendations, we are behind (losing) a mythical £220.

In mitigation I do come out ahead most seasons and am planning to do so again!

Most don’t understand the conversion of odds into percentages but a simple guide: Even-money is 50/50 or 50% vs 50%. 2/1 is 33%. 4/1 is 20%. Basically how much you need to put on to return 100 points. 33/1 is 3%. 10/1 is 9% etc etc etc"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Hardliner, 09/10/2013 11:17

"Highly amusing and only superficially controversial - he is just about right. Except for one thing. So far Roy seems to be out of the money, showing minus 220something or other. I dont claim to understand betting [yet] but I reckon I can understand maths once I've had something explained once, so Roy would you please show us your calculations [I prefer %ages to odds] and how you ended up at -220 and I might be tempted to weigh in....PS Massa and Webber, just how did they get that good but not good enough [Coulthard too?]"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms