Stewart launches blistering attack on Ecclestone and Mosley

05/01/2009
NEWS STORY

With the strains of Auld Lang Syne still ringing in our ears, three-time World Champion Jackie Stewart has launched (another) stinging attack on the two sassenachs he claims are destroying Formula One, Bernie Ecclestone and Max Mosley.

Ahead of twelfth night, the last day of merry-making in celebration of Christmas, and the day when all decorations should be taken down, the Scot has nailed his colours firmly to the door, calling on both men to stand down for the good of the sport.

"The era of big change is now essential because the sport has grown larger than either the governors or the commercial-rights holders," says Stewart in an interview with The Times.

"And that's just a fact," he continues. It has taken too long to achieve the things it should have achieved years ago and that other sports have long ago matured to, and other sports have prepared themselves more fully for the opportunities that have come their way."

In the case of Ecclestone, Stewart believes the F1 supremo has simply become to powerful. While he appreciates the fact that the Englishman has taken the sport from relative obscurity and put it on televisions in homes in almost every country on earth, making a lot of people - the Scot included - very wealthy in the process, he believes Ecclestone now has too much power, both for his own good and that of the sport.

"Having done it, he now rules and nobody is up for taking on a battle with him. Bernie has such power and influence that he could suffocate almost any performer who would dare to suggest that there must be change."

Stewart also fears for the sport's future should anything happen to Ecclestone, the Englishman having seemingly made no plans as to who would take over should he need to step down.

"I don't think Bernie can bring people in to help him in a transition phase," says Stewart. "He has been so used to total control that if you look at his structure you have to ask yourself 'is there a successor?' and you would say 'no'. That is wrong. The commercial reality has to be recognised ... and there has to be continuity that the ageing process makes necessary."

While many of us might feel there has been a rift between Ecclestone and Mosley in recent years, not least in the wake of last year's sex scandal, Stewart still sees the duo as Tweedledum and Tweedledee, the 'toxic twins' joined at the hip, in total charge of all facets of the sport.

"They haven't looked after the house properly and the foundations are built on just this two-man working relationship," says the Scot. "This has evoked concern and apprehension on the part of those involved in the sport. When Max Mosley had the scandal erupt around him, how many team principals or owners spoke out? None.

"Why, you may ask? When McLaren were, according to some, victimised by the FIA in late 2007 for allegedly cheating, how many of the other teams thought, 'That could be us, we must stand behind them.' Who did? In fear of repercussions, nobody did. I was one of the few people who spoke out on both issues.

"I have no commercial ramifications surrounding my continuing involvement in the sport," he continues, "but, if there was something that did pop up or that was researched on me, I am sure it would be used. Now that is not a democratic organisation."

Other than absolute power, Stewart cites the sheer amount of money Ecclestone has made from F1 as his biggest gripe, accusing the Englishman of putting nothing back into the sport.

"Nothing is coming back into the sport," he says. "The financial distribution of Formula One appears to have been sorted out by two people who have directed it in whichever way they have seen fit. Although this has been a significant benefit in some ways, it has also hurt the sport because the balance of contribution within Formula One is absolutely untenable.

"The teams have got all the capital investment, yet they get no more than 50 per cent of the revenues. The next largest capital investment is by the racetracks who currently receive little or nothing from the revenues apart from what they get for bums on seats. Hardly any of them receive anything from TV revenues or the circuit advertising or the title sponsorship or the commercial hospitality. How can they reinvest when they have little or no income outside of spectator attendance fees?"

Pointing out - quite rightly in our humble opinion - that North America's absence from the 2009 F1 calendar is "ridiculous", Stewart saves his real vitriol for the man with whom there is much history.

Stewart makes no bones about it, he insists, much as he did last year at the height of the sex scandal, and on various other occasions before then, that Mosley must go.

"I think Max should remove himself from the FIA completely and from motorsport and the motor industry," says the Scot. "The FIA should replace him with somebody not from within its organisation or even within motorsport. They should go out and headhunt a CEO who is going to rebuild the structure in line with modern practice to satisfy the investors in the sport and to give the FIA total transparency."

While many believed the 2007 scandal was the end of Mosley, the Englishman, having won in the law courts, and in the eyes of his colleagues within the FIA, appears stronger than ever, with talk of him staying on for another term.

"The scandal created the opportunity for a new structure to be born," says Stewart. "That opportunity has been overtaken by one man's insistence on remaining, which would have been impossible had it been an Olympic committee, the Football Association or a publicly held company. How can we accept that in a sport so dependent on multinational corporations and even governments for its revenues and which also requires a totally transparent and independent rule-making body?"

As we have said before, there is history between these three men. However, while pointing the finger at Ecclestone and Mosley, it must be remembered that Stewart has also done well out of F1. There are many within the paddock who have their own feelings as to how he handled his own F1 team, and how he allegedly touted sponsors - notably the Royal Bank of Scotland - to various teams, while Jaguar (nee Stewart) was going down the tubes.

No doubt Mosley and Ecclestone will share their thoughts in the weeks ahead.

Same s**t, different year.

Article from Pitpass (http://www.pitpass.com):

Published: 05/01/2009
Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.