Site logo

Stella dismisses talk of missed team orders opportunity

NEWS STORY
07/04/2025

McLaren boss, Andrea Stella denies that his team would have been best served by having Lando Norris move aside for teammate Oscar Piastri.

Having lost out to Max Verstappen's bravura performance in qualifying, McLaren's best chance of claiming the race victory was to jump the Dutchman at the start of the race... it failed.

Consequently the Woking pair were forced to spend the afternoon running in the Red Bull's dirty air.

As Norris held back in a bid to preserve his tyres, teammate Piastri believed he had better pace to attack the race leader, but the team opted to maintain the status quo.

"I needed the straight to be about another 100 metres longer, and then maybe I could have had a small chance," said Piastri of his failure to overhaul his teammate under his own steam. "I got close a couple of times, but never close enough to do anything realistically.

"I felt like I had strong pace," he continued, "but just not quite enough to be able to do anything. With the dirty air, once you get so close, it's very difficult to stay so close. Consequently, the chance of anything happening realistically was pretty slim."

The Australian called on the team but his advice was ignored.

"On the pit stop timing, Russell had pitted, I think the lap before, and Leclerc wasn't that far behind," said Piastri. "We didn't really know what the undercut power was going to be like. We'd kind of gone a fair way into the race on the mediums anyway, so from my side, there wasn't anything that that obviously wrong with what we did.

"And then at the end, I said what I felt. Clearly, the team were happy with the way things were, and, I mean, if I was in Lando's position, I would also be pretty happy with the way things were. That's fine, I just said what I felt in the car and that's how we want to go."

"I could see Max quite clearly for the whole race, but just couldn't make any inroads," said Norris. "I think him in clean air was enough to stay in that position and he didn't make any mistakes. He drove a good race.

"The race was won yesterday in hindsight," he admitted, "and I guess we always kind of know the better position you start, the more chance you have of winning.

"I think our pace was probably slightly better, but not enough to get through the dirty air, and kind of get into the DRS. And then passing is a whole other story, because it's pretty much impossible to pass here.

"We tried some things," he added. "Maybe we could have tried a bit more with strategy and overcut or undercut. We just boxed on the same lap for some reason. So some things we'll discuss, but good points for us as a team.

"Decent points for me, of course, would have liked a little bit more, but have to take seconds sometimes."

"I don't think it is so clear that Oscar was faster," insisted Stella. "I think Lando was trying to get in Max's slipstream even closer, but any time you went below one second there was a significant loss of grip.

"So then Lando was doing a little bit of an elastic today, trying to cool down a bit his tyres, going again. So I don't think it is a situation that we should judge at face value in terms of what the pace of the car was.

"Lando was trying to get close to Verstappen with maximum momentum, but it was difficult."

The track resurfacing has led to less abrasion and thereby less tyre wear, something which had previously provided overtaking opportunities.

"It was something we knew right from the start that on this track you need seven, eight tenths of performance advantage in order to be able to overtake," said the Italian. "This sort of lap time difference may be generated because there is degradation in the tyres, but with the new tarmac, Suzuka has changed the feature of being a high degradation circuit. It is now a very low degradation circuit. It was a very easy one-stop and there are not many strategic options."

Again, Stella believes the race was lost on Saturday.

"I'm sure our two drivers will have commented themselves that their qualifying laps were not the best laps in qualifying in their careers," he said. "Clearly when Max elevates the game so much, you need to nail laps in qualifying and you need to bring home any possible millisecond.

"Yesterday it was indeed a matter of milliseconds with 43, 45 between P3 and P1. "So ultimately I think the qualifying laps yesterday in Q3 were even more a determining factor than anything that happened today in the race."

Check out our Sunday gallery from Suzuka here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Editor, 09/04/2025 16:30

"@ Ricardo-sanchez

Post of the week"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by kenji, 09/04/2025 14:51

"@Ricardo-sanchez......England and Australia have deep ties in the the world of sporting competition, long may it last. That said however there are some rather 'in your face' examples of intra team discrimination that determines reasoning behind my attitude. I remind you of the Vettel 'multi 21 scenario and if you haven't already read Webber's book i suggest that you do. The reason he left Red Bull was simply due to the benefits afforded Vettel by the team. The second blatant manipulation was the Verstappen/Ricciardo incident in Baku. Daniel has stated that the team blame that was heaped onto him was the catalyst for his leaving Red Bull. There are many other instances but these two are most blatant IMO. Is it any wonder that we question strategies designed to hinder some Australian drivers..... and that's no 'spiracy."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by kenji, 09/04/2025 13:56

"@ Ricardo-sanchez...Hahaha Im the real world I am the greatest cynic when it comes to consiracy theories and that translates pretty much into F1 despite what some others may think. As you know you can't have a conspiracy of one and I really do think that Norris gets the better options when they are on the table. IMO Piastri is not looking for 'gimmes' just the chance to compete on a completely equitable basis. One statement from Zac Brown made many years ago [ which I subsequently cannot find ] he was asked about his relationships with his drivers and he said ' Lando has been with us for a long time and I treat him on and off the track as if he's my own son'. Now that's a fine sentiment but how does that affect his judgement in the heat of a race decision when both drivers should be duking it out? If that statement and the subsequent team orders that have been implemented over the past two years are taken into consideration then you have the basis for what some may deem an agenda/conspiracy theory. Roll on Bahrain and the next chapter....

"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 09/04/2025 13:25

"@kenji – It’s always refreshing to see your objectivity in action. If there’s one thing we can rely on, it’s that when a British driver finishes ahead, it can only be the result of a covert team conspiracy designed to hold back raw Antipodean greatness.

If McLaren had really wanted to hold Piastri back, they’d have just said it. They’ve done it in the past. No need for “cryptic language” or secret code words. What we got was the usual back-and-forth you hear any time a driver thinks they’ve got more pace than their teammate - followed by the reality that no one could really pass anyone else at Suzuka this year.

I can’t wait to see what dastardly NPA deeds will surface in Bahrain! "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 09/04/2025 13:14

"@Editor - Ha, yes; the agenda’s about as subtle as a Helmut Marko driver evaluation. But credit where it’s due: Kenji’s conspiratorial consistency is championship-grade, and the comments section wouldn’t be half as entertaining without his unique interpretations."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by kenji, 09/04/2025 12:38

"@Ricardo-sanchez. Tin hats are an option and I'm glad that you acknowledge confidence when it is expressed. I'm sure that you're aware that the team orders were given...in an ambiguous fashion as recognised by Piastri at the time he was informed. The fact is that Piastri, the driver on the spot, was saying that he 'felt he had the speed to chase down Verstappen' and he and he wanted to do what racing drivers are supposed to do...race. He was denied the opportunity!

Consider this. If Oscar had been successful [and it's a big if] then most likely Verstappen would've come second because we know that Norris couldn't tackle Verstappen, leaving Norris third.
A quick adjustment of the points appears to have Piastri on 59, Norris on 59 and Verstappen on54. What this does is put Norris under huge pressure for the WDC despite it being very early days. In the constructors McLaren would still have a very healthy lead. I suggest that you read Mark Webber's comments for another viewpoint despite him having 'skin in the game'. Bahrain will be another chance to see where the 'biscuit breaks' in this duel for supremacy. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Editor, 09/04/2025 8:50

"@ Ricardo_sanchez,

Oh come on, you know exactly what his agenda is, and always has been."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 09/04/2025 8:36

"@kenji – I admire the confidence with which you connect those dots, but I think your tinfoil hat might have slipped down over your eyes this time!

Fragments of radio messages — vague at best and open to multiple interpretations — aren’t proof of a team conspiracy. If McLaren really didn’t want Oscar to race Norris, they’d have told him directly. They didn’t. Piastri himself said he couldn’t get close enough to make anything happen — hardly the words of someone being silenced by the ‘Norris Protection Agency’.

As for the brake issue in China being an invention… come on. Do we really think McLaren faked a fault, risked a DNF, and handed Oscar a win just to boost Lando’s image? At this point, I’m not sure if you’re being serious or aiming for satire."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by kenji, 09/04/2025 1:27

"@Mad Matt.... That 'pit incident', as you rightly say, was never going to end well. It was dumb IMO. Verstappen was no doubt having a giggle about it all. When desperation takes over all manner of foolish decisioms are undertaken. This was one of them. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by kenji, 08/04/2025 12:36

"@Ricardo-sanchez....'If Lando is still saving I think he should go soon'

' I think I have the pace to get Max'

'This is Lando's pace' What does this say exactly?

'I still think I have the pace to get Max'.

I find that Stallard's answer rather ambiguous and
displays the team's reluctance to allow Piastri to at least mount a challenge. The positions could always be reversed if unsuccessful but no. Norris can't be challenged.

Piastri's later comments were simply diplomatic. As for the brakes in China....that was just an invention to cover Norris's poor performance. There has been no further discussion [ to my knowledge ] of what the real root of the problem, if there was one, actually was?"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

11. Posted by ausieausieausie, 08/04/2025 1:56

"Just think if they banned radios!!!!!!!!!"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

12. Posted by Ricardo_sanchez, 07/04/2025 20:41

"@kenji - your theory that McLaren is running a covert Norris Protection Agency seems to hinge on reading between lines that aren’t actually there. You assert there were team orders “in cryptic language.” Where? Is there a transcript?

Piastri hasn’t claimed he was prevented from racing Norris - only that he felt he was quicker and shared his view. Surely you’re not suggesting the team should have manipulated the result by telling Norris to cede his position rather than just letting its drivers race?

Piastri himself said staying close enough to make a move on Norris wasn’t possible in the dirty air. Stella and Norris simply said the same.

As for the Norris Protection Agency - the operatives must have been on their lunch break in China. Bit of an oversight letting Norris’ brakes fail while he was chasing Piastri. You’d think if they were rigging the results, they’d at least keep that “No.1” car in working order! ;-)"

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

13. Posted by Mad Matt, 07/04/2025 14:32

"@kenji I'm not sure what the whole pit lane race was all about... it was never going to end well. I know it was the only opportunity to do something but the overtake was never on and the risks of putting it in the wall were very high."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

14. Posted by kenji, 07/04/2025 13:59

"@Mad Matt...all cool. What i seriously don't appreciate is that the Stella 'drone' is most times designed to sow confusion. It's not just me upholding the 'contrarian' label. Many dyed in the wool F1 patriots have voiced identical opinions. All good fun but equally frustrating. As for your last para...yes, it seems as though Oscar has made the cut through in the media as I have noticed that both drivers are more often than not mentioned in the same context and usually as equals in competitive terms. Oscar seems to have further sharpened up his racecraft and seems to be in far better control of his personal outcomes on track than last year. On the other side I have noticed that Norris is making a few more errors under pressure. His silly pit exit on Sunday was a perfect example further amplified by his plaintive call to the 'stewards'. What was he thinking? His big lock up at the final corner on the final lap wasn't pretty either. What will happen as we get deeper into the season?"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

15. Posted by Chester, 07/04/2025 12:43

"Reading Stella's denial about team orders being futile caused the Doobie Brothers to ring-out in my head" "What a fool believes.". "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2025. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms