F1 CEO, Stefano Domenicali insists that the Andrettis are doing their cause to enter F1 no good by constantly running to the media.

While Mohammed Ben Sulayem's claim that the sport isn't worth the $20bn the Saudi sovereign wealth fund was said to have offered owners Liberty appeared to be the straw that broke the camel's back - no pun intended - the FIA president's stance on Andretti's bid to enter the sport certainly didn't help.

While F1 bosses and the majority of the teams insisted that ten teams is enough, the FIA president not only spoke in favour of the American bid, he began the process to welcome two new teams.

Now that Ben Sulayem is taking his hands off the wheel in terms of the day to day running of the sort, Andretti's best hope appears to be a change of heart from F1, however, the sport's CEO, Stefano Domenicali insists that the hopefuls are doing themselves no favours.

"First of all, we are very welcoming of everyone that is bringing value to the racing," he tells Sky Sports. "I think we need to respect everyone.

"There are teams like Mario and Michael Andretti being very vocal about their will to enter Formula 1," he continues. "But in my view it is not smart to say that teams are greedy.

"There are others that are much less vocal that would like to come into Formula 1, so there is a process to respect and we will make sure together with the FIA that the process will be respected."

Fact is however, that whatever you want to call it, the issue does appear to be about money, indeed, at a time the existing teams are seeking at least $600m in compensation for the loss of prize money that an eleventh team would mean, Red Bull boss, Christian Horner has admitted that the attitude towards the Andretti bid is purely down to cash.

"As with all these things, it ultimately boils down to... 'Well, who's going to pay for it?'" he told RACER last month. "And you can assume that the teams, if they're perceived to be the ones who are paying for it, or diluting their payments to accommodate it, of course it's not going to sit well.

"The two teams that are supporting it either have a partnership in the U.S. with them or are going to supply them an engine," he added, referring to Alpine and McLaren. "The other eight are saying: 'Well hang on, why should we dilute our element of the prize fund?'"

More recently the Briton suggested that Andretti consider buying an existing team, a move that would almost automatically see potential targets raise their asking price accordingly whilst also lumbering the newcomers with facilities and staff they almost certainly don't want.

"Red Bull Racing was Jaguar, which was Stewart Ford," he told the Daily Mail. "Look at Mercedes, that goes all the way back through Honda to British American Racing to Tyrell. Aston Martin go back to being Jordan. That has been the procedure for many years."

No sooner had Andretti announced its partnership with Cadillac last month, that F1 said that other potential teams were showing interest also.

"If all the elements are there, they will be very welcome," says Domenicali. "There are a lot of dimensions to consider and we don't have to overreact because someone is pushing the system. The process will be done seriously in the right way someone is shouting and someone is not shouting.

"I would have acted in a different way," adds the former Ferrari boss.

In the eyes of many, at a time F1 is enjoying unprecedented popularity in the US, bringing an American teams into the sport, especially a team with the racing pedigree of Andretti would appear to be a no-brainer.

"I would say we need to be prudent," insists Domenicali. "It may seem this is a personal negative attack on Andretti but this is not the case. We need to be serious and professional in evaluating all the elements."

LATEST NEWS

more news >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

Click to go to the main galleries section

READERS COMMENTS

1. Posted by kenji, 15/02/2023 1:21

"The latterday Canadian philosopher Marshall McLuhan had it all nutted out and his famous statement, 'The medium is the message' strikes at the very heart of what we are currently undergoing with the future of F1 swinging in the balance. "

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Spindoctor, 14/02/2023 12:28

"It seems Liberty\F1 (as opposed to Formula One, the Sport) are focusing on building a Media-based Brand, not a Racing Series. Mr Editor Balfe's most recent Newsletter considers this notion rather gloomily (for us old-timers at least) in some depth."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by JR Martin, 13/02/2023 18:06

"@rtw1951...sadly, they're in the weeds. Frustrating to see the direction they're headed in but not surprised. It's similar to what I experienced in the past as an independent car owner. We started with USAC sprint cars in '69 and bought our first Indy car from Dan Gurney in '72. With the demise of USAC we became one of the original members of CART. 38 teams and more cars entered Indy than were gird places to hold them. Not anymore. It became too political, too cliquish and too expensive so we hung it up in '82. I smiled when you mentioned McLaren. When we bought the Eagle we got a call from Bill Smith (perhaps the PP editor may remember Harry William "Bill" Smith). Bill started as an owner/driver along with Teddy Maher, Tim Mayer and Peter Revson. After the loss of Tim they joined with Bruce McLaren...the rest is history many of you know of. When we first met Bill he was president of McLaren North America. He gave us a ton of help just as Goodyear did when we let their drivers run our sprinter. And as a side note, we co-owned a sprint car with AJ Watson that Mario drove on many occasions. And Mario is far from being vocal as some claim. But now F1 is at the mercy of egotists and in racing terms, they're running out of brains. "

Rating: Positive (3) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by overdriver, 13/02/2023 17:27

"@rtw1951 With you all the way my friend (even though you 'renamed' John Surtees).
My very first meeting was the 1958 British Grand Prix where amongst the privateers were two Connaughts entered by a B. Ecclestone (who was also listed as reserve driver). Poacher turned gamekeeper? Actually probably not as gamekeepers tend to remain on the right side of the law.
Just saying....."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Defiant, 13/02/2023 16:49

"@rtw1951. I know how you feel. I've not been following F1 for as long (or been alive as long) but last year was the first year that I didn't watch a single race live since the early-mid 80s. I also feel like things have been declining at an astonishing pace since the wrinkly old one sold F1 to Liberty. Even the FIA hasn't managed to improve itself after all the changes it's instigated. JMB was diabolical, MM was a tyrant, JT was just weak and poor, but things just haven't improved since the new ones came in with big ideas. I now follow F1 through Pitpass and I don't feel like I'm missing out on a single thing."

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Burton, 13/02/2023 12:38

"Wolff and Horner have talked about it way more than Michael has, criticise them too Stefano!"

Rating: Positive (5) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by KKK, 13/02/2023 11:32

"Do me a favour ! Too vocal? Ive not heard a peep from Andretti other than their link with Cadillac. In comparison Ive heard a bucketful of verbal junk from Domenicali, Ben Sulayem, Horner and Steiner. I would love to see Andretti in, more competition the better. If youre too slow you shouldnt be in F1 and waste sponsors money !"

Rating: Positive (8) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Andretti too "vocal" says Domenicali

LATEST NEWS

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

POST A COMMENT

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

Share this page