Site logo

Crack down on driver jewellery gets underway

NEWS STORY
06/05/2022

Checks on whether drivers are wearing jewellery and FIA-approved underwear have been made part of the official scrutineering submission.

The move, which has the full support of FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, sets up a possible confrontation with the likes of Lewis Hamilton at a time the sport is enjoying unprecedented, positive global media coverage.

Having previously warned of the crackdown, race director Niels Wittich, who returns to duty this weekend after testing negative for COVID, in a note to the teams on Thursday included a scrutineering declaration which has been amended for this event to include checks relating to compliant underwear and concerning the wearing of jewellery.

For clarity, he notes... Appendix L to the ISC, Chapter III includes:

2. Flame-resistant clothing

"(...) Drivers and co-drivers participating in the championships listed below must wear overalls as well as gloves (optional for co-drivers), long underwear, a balaclava, socks and shoes homologated to the FIA 8856-2018 standard (Technical List No 74):

(...) * Formula One World Championship (...) In case of justified medical reasons, non FIA-approved underwear may be worn between the driver's skin and the compulsory FIA-approved underwear. However, the use of synthetic, non-flameproof materials in contact with the driver's skin is not authorised.

Drivers and co-drivers can wear additional flameproof underwear, which is not FIA approved, between their skin and the compulsory FIA-approved underwear."

5. Wearing of jewellery

"The wearing of jewellery in the form of body piercing or metal neck chains is prohibited during the competition and may therefore be checked before the start."

He adds, in relation to Appendix L, Chapter III, Article 2 the following additional note is provided for the information of all teams and all officials:

The above noted regulation is written to ensure that the FIA-approved Flame-resistant clothing, including both the outer layer overalls and inner layer in contact with the skin can operate effectively and provide the designed level of protection if exposed to flames.

The use of non-flameproof materials in contact with the driver's skin, and in particular synthetic materials, can reduce heat transmission protection and thus increase the risk of burn injuries in the event of a fire. In the worst case such materials may melt which can hinder treatment in the event of a burn injury.

In relation to Appendix L, Chapter III, Article 5 the following additional note is provided for the information of all teams and all officials:

The above noted regulation is written in consideration that the wearing of jewellery underneath the required flameproof clothing can reduce the protection afforded by this equipment. Metallic objects, such as jewellery, in contact with the skin can reduce heat transmission protection and thus may increase the risk of burn injuries in the event of a fire.

The wearing of jewellery during the competition can hinder both medical interventions as well as subsequent diagnosis and treatment should it be required following an accident.

The presence of jewellery can slow, due to the risk of "snagging", the emergency removal of driver safety equipment such as helmet, balaclava, and overalls.

In the case that medical imaging is required to inform diagnosis following an accident the presence of jewellery on the body can cause significant complication and delay. In the worst case the presence of jewellery during imaging may cause further injury.

Jewellery in and/or around the airway can pose specific additional risks should it become dislodged during an accident and either ingested or inhaled.

Drivers were first warned of the move at the start of the Melbourne weekend, which led to a long discussion of the matter at the subsequent drivers' briefing.

Speaking after the event, Hamilton, who had previously joked that he had "certain piercings that I really just can't take out that not many people know of", admitted, when asked about his ear piercing and nose stud: "I don't have any plans on removing them.

"I feel there are personal things," he added. "You should be able to be who you are.

"There is stuff that I can't move," he continued. "I literally can't even take these out... these ones on my right ear, they are literally welded in so I have to get them chopped off or something like that. So they will be staying."

Check out our Friday gallery from Miami, here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by fenris, 07/05/2022 5:04

"@Max -- "marital" arts competitions? Where do I get tickets to one of these? ;)

Jokes aside, "enforce or sign a waiver" indeed seems the logical way to go."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Defiant, 06/05/2022 16:35

"Although the rules make sense on one level, particularly in an emergency situation and the diagnosis that may be needed.
I absolutely HATE the nanny state dictating what people do, so I'm pretty torn in this situation. I've had to remove jewellery for my work in the past, but it certainly 91$$ed me right off at the time.

As for the underwear...... what are they saying? they're going to police your underwear too???? I think the FIA has become some kind of parody of itself. Utterly ridiculous.
"

Rating: Negative (-4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by prime, 06/05/2022 15:26

"let them chose? The FIA and FOM have a choice as well, would they risk damaging reputation by relaxing the rules and waiting for the unthinkable to happen."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by prime, 06/05/2022 15:20

"what a disaster for the Mercedes propaganda campaign against the FIA for "not enforcing the rules""

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by LiamIII, 06/05/2022 14:55

"@ Sir Lewis- "I feel there are personal things," he added. "You should be able to be who you are."

Yes indeed, and you can personally choose another line of work that lets you do this. "would you like fries with that burger?""

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by jcr, 06/05/2022 13:00

"This is being pushed under safety, Supposed to be mandatory-"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Endre, 06/05/2022 12:55

"@Spindoctor Let's say Hamilton's nose piercing gets dislodged in an accident (can easily happen with sharp things flying around), he inhales it, causes an embolism and he dies. Do you think the World would just quietly say it is too bad but it was his choice? They would be kicking and seeming at the FIA for not enforcing safety rules.

Same goes for any company. No matter what the employee chooses, there are safety requirements and PPE that are mandatory, no matter what waiver anyone would be willing to sign. This is a personal choice only to the extent that you either except it and work there or go look for something else to do. Should something bad happen, the employer always takes the blame and held responsible."

Rating: Positive (7)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Max Noble, 06/05/2022 12:54

"@Spindoctor - quite so! Any authority can only do so much to out law stupidity… If he meets all other safely requirements let him dangle 15Kg around his neck, and let the fuel saving commence!

@Kenji - Ah, such simple times back then… ;-)"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by kenji, 06/05/2022 12:09

"
The Mr.T look is just so naff these days."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by Spindoctor, 06/05/2022 11:28

"@Max Noble - seems like a plan!
This isn't the same as (say) the neck brace. As long as the danger is to the individual driver only, it seems fair to let him choose. Not sure that drivers' (i.e. Hamilton's) ear & nose jewellery would cause significant injury except in a truly appalling crash, in which they would probably be the least of his worries!"

Rating: Negative (-2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

11. Posted by Max Noble, 06/05/2022 10:44

"Enforce, or sign a waiver…. I’ve seen people with ears, noses, and lips shredded at marital art competitions because they refused to remove items… Hurt them way more than it hurt me… In summary it is a logical safety requirement…"

Rating: Positive (10)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

12. Posted by jcr, 06/05/2022 10:37

"No mention of penalties or sanctions
Hopeful the FIA will stand their ground and follow through."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

13. Posted by Mad Matt, 06/05/2022 10:05

"These rules have been around for a while and relate to safety so seem reasonable to me. Romain Grojean's accident showed how these things can become important."

Rating: Positive (7)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

14. Posted by Spindoctor, 06/05/2022 7:43

"Nice to see that "New FIA" is focusing on the really important aspects of the Sport...."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms