Already hurting as Lewis Hamilton cruised to a second successive victory, and Mercedes third 1-2 of the season, Ferrari faced further criticism from fans and the media for a strategy which appeared to be all over the place and effectively cost Charles Leclerc fourth place.

Having passed his teammate on the run to T1, Leclerc was subsequently told to yield to Vettel who appeared to have more pace at a time the Mercedes duo were pulling away. However, once through, the German continued to lose ground to the Silver Arrows, while the Monegasque was now left exposed to an aggressive strategy from Red Bull which saw Max Verstappen go for the undercut.

"It was not an easy decision, because we understand the drivers need to battle to stay ahead as much as they can," said Binotto. "As a team we need to maximize the team's points. In that respect, we made the right choice.

"We could not lose time to the Mercedes ahead, and that was the only chance we got," he continued. "We tried, it didn't work, but it seemed right to give that chance to Seb."

"I understand the feeling of Charles, it's a shame for him," he subsequently told Sky Sports F1. "But at that stage of the race the Mercedes were slightly faster, we simply tried to give Sebastian a go and see if we could've kept the pace of the Mercedes, which was key at that stage of the race.

"It was not to give an advantage to a driver, to the other driver," he insisted, "merely as a team to try whatever we could. It was an important moment of the race.

"I think with an undercut he would've anyway... one of the two drivers would've been undercut... whoever was the driver," he added.

"As team perspective, I think that wouldn't have changed, that's why, again, I think the choice was simply try everything we could at that stage.

"If Charles is upset, he's right to be upset, and we should accept it," he admitted. "I think it's a shame for him, and next time maybe it will be to his advantage.

"Mercedes has been fast the entire weekend since Friday, they have been fastest in qualifying and they proved to be faster today as well. What is interesting is that within two races the situation has changed completely. We were fast in Bahrain, two weeks after it has been the opposite. I think this is the way we need to look at the championship, each single race the cars will be different. It’s our duty and task now to turn up the cars as much as we can and make sure we are always on top."

Vettel, who claimed his first podium finish of the season, said he understood the team's decision, even though it was to cost his teammate fourth place.

"The priority always lies with the team," he said, "Charles is aware, I am aware, that we are driving for the team. We are fighting for our own race, but usually with this kind of stuff, it's never pleasant.

"We have so many races, only time will tell whether we did something right or wrong," he continued. "Obviously I want to be ahead of Charles, he wants to be ahead of me, that's the name of the game. I think the upsetting thing after the race is that we didn't manage to finish third and fourth.

"We need to try to get stronger and fight Mercedes, which is currently a little bit ahead. We need to understand why we are behind and work on that so we don't have to worry about these things."

Check out our Sunday gallery from Shanghai, here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

Click to go to the main galleries section

READERS COMMENTS

1. Posted by Spindoctor, 16/04/2019 6:50

"I don't see how Ferrari can even attempt to justify a patently stupid 'strategy', the only purpose of which seemed to be to protect Vettel's delicate ego.
Sitting in my armchair, and fuelled by nothing more powerful than Orange Juice, it was obvious that Leclerc was driving better than Vettel, a view borne-out by subsequent events. Compounding that already bad decision with a patently bonkers tyre-stop strategy could have only one outcome, which duly developed.

Mercedes would not make those mistakes, though other mistakes are available, and will probably happen. Lewis may have won umpteen races for Toto & Co. but there will be no ego-massaging from them if they gain more by letting Bottas beat Hamilton."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by C5, 15/04/2019 21:53

"Ferrari are clearly pulling away in the shoot-yourself-in-the-foot and complete-bag-of-balls-strategy championships this year. Getting rid of Arrivabene was clearly a mistake; at current pace I wouldn't bet on Binotto still being in charge by the winter break."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Barslug, 15/04/2019 3:07

"Poor kid. First he loses a sure win with a reliably problem, then in the next race he is sacrificed so princesses Vettel won’t throw a temper tantrum. Let them race! "

Rating: Positive (2) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Obsidian, 14/04/2019 19:33

"@Toffeecup0 Team orders are allowed. Ferrari's use of them in this case was a poor decision, no matter how Ferrari try and spin it, but also within the rules."

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by imejl99, 14/04/2019 17:40

"Any explanation why not soft for Leclerc at final stop?"

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Lapps, 14/04/2019 17:32

"Charles was able to remain ahead of Seb, even though the latter had the use of DRS. So effectively he was about 0.5 sec faster. Despite this he was required to yeld. Then to make things worse he was instructed to remain out on badly worn tyres in order to impede Bottas, further compromising his race.

This comes just after he was totally excluded from the post Bahrain Tests, not even getting to turn a wheel. Seb got a full day and Schumi got two full days. Strange to exclude a Driver new to a team from an important test.

When you consider he has just lost a race win to a car problem, perhaps a call to Toto would be a good option!"

Rating: Positive (4) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Toffeecup0, 14/04/2019 17:25

"Why does Charles have to yield to vettel I was given to understand that team orders were banned both drivers should be made equal who does vettel think he is gods gift reminds me of the Schumacher days where barrichello had to yield to that bloody German it’s all wrong wake up Ferrari "

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Binotto defends team tactics

LATEST NEWS

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

POST A COMMENT

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

Share this page