While some take the Lewis Hamilton and Toto Wolff line that yesterday's defeat at Silverstone was the result of "tactics" which involve Sebastian Vettel and Kimi Raikkonen deliberately targeting the Silver Arrows, others are of the belief that had the Briton made a better start he would not have fallen 'victim' to The Iceman, and that at the same time, just one week after the strategic disaster that was Austria, the German team got it wrong again.

When the safety car was deployed following Marcus Ericsson's crash, Mercedes elected to leave both drivers out, thereby handing Valtteri Bottas the lead - and track position - over Vettel, while at the same time allowing Hamilton to get ahead of Raikkonen and Max Verstappen.

However, Vettel made short work of Bottas, and in the latter stages as his tyres deteriorated further, the Finn was passed by Raikkonen and Verstappen.

"I think it was absolutely the right decision to do,'' said Wolff. "There were 15 or 16 laps until the end with mediums that would last.

"Gaining track position was the interesting one for us and that triggered our decision," he added. "I think that both strategies are valid. But doing the opposite was the choice we went for and at the end it brought us a P2 and P4 and I think considering how the race started, we need to accept the result as an acceptable outcome with real damage limitation.

"In hindsight I think the safety car went against him,'' he added. ''Sebastian was managing the tyres already again, like on the first set of the softs, you could see he was very fast at the beginning but then the tyre fell away.

"Maybe we would have had a chance at the end to attack with no safety car but that's two maybe's. Maybe we would have had the chance and maybe not.''

Check out our Sunday gallery from Silverstone, here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

Click to go to the main galleries section

READERS COMMENTS

1. Posted by Editor, 10/07/2018 15:40

"@ Spindoctor

Re: "like Hamilton we all need to move on"

Which, judging by your three most recent posts, you clearly haven't"

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Spindoctor, 10/07/2018 15:31

"Mercedes' 'strategy' was naff, and their tactics worse. However it was Hamilton's poor start that started the rot. Not becuase Kimi punted him off, but becuase it would have been hard to pass Vettel from 3rd or 4th.
BUT Vettel's temperament is flawed and if Lewis could have kept up pressure he might well have cracked....

That however is all ifs, buts, and maybes and like Hamilton we all need to move on."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Wolff defends Mercedes strategy

LATEST NEWS

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

POST A COMMENT

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

Share this page