Site logo

A decade of braking progress

NEWS STORY
16/06/2018

Exceptional progress has characterized the last 10 years of F1 racing, confirming its role as the most technologically advanced test bench on the planet. This is true not only for the engineers and the leading manufacturers, but also for producers of components like Brembo.

From 2008 to 2018, braking systems were at the core of developments and increases in performance of remarkable dimensions. Improvements have also influenced the way drivers brake, which is decidedly different to 10 years ago.

Today's single-seaters are clearly very different from those of 2008 and the changed braking behaviour cannot and should not be attributed solely to the brakes. The cars have different weight distributions and aerodynamic loads, but more importantly their tyres are wider (and the tyre manufacturer is different). All of these factors play a significant role in differentiating braking performance.

Similarly, the evolution of Brembo's braking systems has seen enormous change over the last 10 years. To demonstrate this, we have compared all of the braking data for the 2008 and 2018 Canadian GP.

Stopping Distance: -22%

The most surprising data stems from a comparison between the two GP races regarding the stopping distance, which went down by a full 22.2%. In 2008, braking at Circuit Gilles Villeneuve required on average 371 feet; this year, 289 feet was enough.

Naturally, we are talking about an average since data varies significantly, even though the trend is the same. On the second to last corner, the one that leads to the Wall of Champions, this year the cars travelled 322 feet while braking and 10 years ago, at the same spot, they needed 384 feet to brake.

Braking Time: -15%

Although noteworthy, the reduction in braking time did not experience the same dramatic decrease as the stopping distance. From 2008 to 2018 in Montreal, the time spent braking per lap went down by a few seconds, a figure equivalent to a 15.5% reduction.

This may seem minimal, but to demonstrate its importance, it's worth noting that: 10 years ago on three of the corners of the Montreal circuit, the drivers used their brakes for more than 2 seconds and on one of these turns, they did so for a good 3 seconds. This year, the most time spent braking was 2.44 seconds at turn 10 and 2 seconds at turn 13.

Load on the Brake Pedal: +4%

While the braking distance went down by 22%, the time spent braking decreased by 'only' 15% for one reason: the force drivers apply to the brake pedal has increased, just like the power of the Brembo braking systems.

In 2008, on average, the drivers applied a load weighing 284 lb on the pedal at each corner of the Canadian GP. This year, the average load measured 295 lb. This 4% increase has made driving style even more important.

Besides there being more force applied by the drivers, the power of the Brembo braking systems has increased just as decidedly. From 2008 to today, the properties of the aluminum-lithium alloy used on the brake calipers has evolved.

Today's calipers are characterized by more complex geometries, which are heightened by continuous research into optimizing the stiffness to weight ratio and by more and more efficient shapes to obtain the cooling the cars require.

Deceleration: +12%

Faster, wider tyres (resulting in a growing ability to dissipate brake torque) and a higher performing Brembo braking system, submit drivers to a deceleration that is far greater to that of the past. In 2008, the average peak deceleration per lap in Montreal was 4.2 G, and in 2018 this same figure went over 4.7 G. This is an increase of 11.9%.

On turn 8 of the Canadian GP, the drivers experience 4.9 G of deceleration compared to 4.4 G in 2008. The difference found on turn 1 is even more significant, both overall and in percentage: it has gone from 3.7 G ten years ago to 4.8 G this year.

Similar variations were registered on the other tracks that have hosted a Grand Prix in 2018. All of this would be even more evident on a track like Monza, where the peak deceleration in 2008 never went over 5 G. But this year, according to calculations made on a simulator, none of the six braking sections will be lower than 5.1 G and when the cars enter the Parabolica, they will go well over 6 G.

Brake Discs: From 200 to 1,400 Holes (+600%)

One of the components on the braking system that went through a visible transformation is the brake disc.

Over the course of the ten years, advancements in research enabled Brembo to progressively increase the number of holes and decrease the dimensions. Ten years ago in 2008, there were about 200 ventilation holes on a Formula 1 disc.

Barely four years later, the number tripled reaching 600 holes. Still, innovation continued and on the cars racing in 2014, the discs had more than 1,000 ventilation holes.

Increasing the surface of the disc exposed to ventilation ensures greater heat dispersion and a reduction in operating temperature. The temperature of the carbon discs used in Formula 1 can get up to 1,832°F for brief periods.

Since 2017, the discs have grown in size from 28 to 32 mm, which allows more space for the ventilation holes and results in further advancements in the evolution of braking system cooling.

Today, each Brembo brake disc can have up to almost 1,400 ventilation holes in the most extreme version, which is about 100 more than the number of holes on the discs used in 2017.

The holes, positioned in four rows, measure 2.5 mm in diameter and are made one-by-one by a precision machine. It takes 12 to 14 hours to make all of the holes on a single disc. At this level, precision is everything: the mechanical component tolerance is only four hundredths.

Brake Pads: Energy Dissipated +10%

The brake pads have also undergone significant change over the last ten years, both in size and in geometry. The overall area of each one increased by less than 2% (from 4,000 mm to 4,070 mm), but they are now longer than in the past: In 2008 they measured 106 x 25 mm, while in 2018 they are 185 x 22 mm.

These days, the pads have to dissipate a lot more energy. In Canada ten years ago, the temperature of the discs at turn 10 got up to a maximum of 1666°F and this year they got to over 1832°F at the same spot.

To remedy this problem, more in-depth research went into the shape of the pad itself. The pads have ventilation holes that are customized according to the requirements of each team.

Brake Caliper: +15% Lighter

Over the course of the last ten years, the brake caliper has experienced a somewhat inconsistent evolution. On one hand, the choices available for the track became simpler, on the other hand, the amount of personalized developments for each team has become more and more prevalent.

In 2008, there were different calipers depending on the circuit the cars were racing on, which caused some issues in terms of selection and made replacing them in an emergency with ones designed for different tracks impossible. However, for a few years now the teams use just one type of caliper for all of the circuits raced during the season.

At the same time, development became increasingly complex. Today, contrary to 10 years ago, F1 requires braking systems that are highly customized according to the different design choices made for each car. Each team Brembo supplies asks for an increasingly tailor-made braking system that is closely integrated with the design of the car and is subject to continuous developments over the course of the season.

For example, the brake caliper is perfectly integrated with the cooling system for the corner of the car (air ducts, drums, deflectors, etc.) and with the aerodynamic solutions developed by the individual teams, making each component unique.

Plus, driver preferences influence the different combinations of stiffness and weight. There are teams that prefer lighter calipers because they need to lower the weight of the car, even though they lose in terms of stiffness. Other want stiffness to the detriment of the mass. Overall, in the face of a weight reduction of just 15% compared to 2008, the brake caliper processing is now much more complex.

Brake-by-Wire

Another significant innovation born during the last 10 years is Brake-By-Wire. The need to guarantee proper braking force to the rear axle, apart from the output torque generated by the electric motors, led to the introduction of another innovation in 2014: Brake-By-Wire (BBW).

Under normal operating conditions, the rear system is no longer activated directly by the driver, but by a high-pressure hydraulic system on the car (much like the ones for suspension and power steering) by means of an electronic vehicle control unit that keeps continuous track of the braking force linked to the two MGUs and the braking distribution imposed by the driver.

The amount of energy to dissipate on the rear axle is equal to the reduced friction, since it is recovered in part by the MGU-K: the result is a less cumbersome and lighter caliper. This is why, in addition to the traditional 6-piston calipers, the maximum allowed by regulation, Brembo supplies several teams with 4-piston calipers to be used at the rear, which responds to their requests for lighter systems.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Uffen, 25/06/2018 12:30

"Yes, it is, but my point is that the delta (the decrease in distance, for example) is not visible. The drop from 300 feet to 250 feet (or whatever) is not visible. Yes, it looks amazing on its own, but the improvements hurt the racing and add nothing to the spectacle. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Insane Reindeer, 19/06/2018 8:16

"What? Umm, this is very easy to see on TV! Just watch any on board footage, for example, when a car is approaching a hairpin turn or other short corner after a decent length straight and the distance, or lack there of, that they need to slow the car down, start the turn in, come off the break and get back on the throttle is just amazing. It boggles the mind how little actual track they need. Watch Vettel's on board pole position winning lap from Canada. If that doesn't impress you on every single level then you seriously need to re-think why you watch F1. It's mind blowing in its brilliance! "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Canuck, 18/06/2018 12:02

"I agree with Uffen that much of the increase in stopping distance or a 1 sec improvement on lap times does not show while at track side or watching on TV. It only shows on a stop watch, great for the engineers but does little to excite the fans. A well planned pass into a corner under braking or a sling shot past cause by using the slip stream of an opponent under well balanced aero design - now those are visible track side or on TV."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Uffen, 16/06/2018 22:06

"Amazing stats, but as usual better science brings about poorer racing. Braking time and distance reduced means less opportunity for out-braking, or overtaking under braking.
And, watching from the stands or on the TV - it doesn't show. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms