Renault boss Cyril Abiteboul insists there was no agenda to the request for clarification on oil burning.

With the possibility of the season opening Australian Grand Prix being overshadowed by an ongoing row over suspension systems, most notably those on the Mercedes and Red Bull, ahead of the pre-season tests Red Bull contacted the FIA to clarify the legality - or not - of oil burning, a practise whereby oil might be used as fuel.

The issue was first raised in 2015, and at the Canadian Grand Prix stewards investigated the Mercedes but found no evidence of wrongdoing. Indeed, it was the German manufacturer which suggested a 5kg limit on oil use.

While it was Red Bull that raised the issue with the FIA pre-Barcelona, it's engine supplier, Renault, admits that it was concerned about the possibility of Mercedes exploiting the practice but insists there was no agenda to the request for a clarification.

"Clarification of regulations is always very important," Cyril Abiteboul told Autosport, "whether it is suspension or whether it is fuel systems, but also oil.

"We are right now in the period of the year where you have lots of traffic going around," he continued, referring to rumours and suspicions, "that is important.

"We were not attacking anyone in particular," he insists. "But we needed to make sure that it is clear to everyone, and it can be properly monitored and enforced that fuel should remain the primary combustible used in F1.

"We are coming into systems that are so complex, and it is very much like suspension systems," he added. "We can refer to the spirit of the regulations - the combustibles are clear for everyone that they should be fuel - but having said that any engine will burn oil. But whether you burn oil for lubrication or as a combustible is something completely different.

"What we feel is that we need to be extremely clear about what should be the spirit, and we need to be clear also and that should be the FIA's responsibility to make sure that it is enforceable. I accept that it is challenging."

LATEST NEWS

more news >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

Click to go to the main galleries section

READERS COMMENTS

1. Posted by bfairey, 17/03/2017 3:24

"Give the trophy to Hamilton and lets go home."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by SideGlance, 17/03/2017 0:47

"maybe this is part of the reason for simpler more reliable engines not hybrids, the sound is not great, the costs and time needed to fix, repair & replace is awful.

Todt may not wish for a return, but i for one would much rather have simpler F1 machines including the engines, none of the engine exhaust blowing via diffuse either !!

Sound, simplicity, more driver focused, less engineering focus, less aero so overtaking is easier, smaller brakes too ?

I love high tech, but not when it makes it a tech show and not a drivers show, i hope liberty makes it a much better and more spectator enjoyable show !!!

Back to the past but with the safety of now, make the drivers sweat NOT due to temperature but effort !"

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Motorsport-fan, 16/03/2017 14:30

"Trick suspension / oil burning, are some of the Mercedes secrets slowly coming out?"

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Renault: No agenda to oil burn request

LATEST NEWS

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

POST A COMMENT

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

Share this page