FIA safety director dismisses arguments put forward by drivers as sport pushes ahead with cockpit safety device.

As the argument over whether Formula One should introduce a driver cockpit safety device, be it the Halo or aeroscreen, intensifies, those on the one side argue that the introduction of such a device would be a step in the wrong direction, whilst others claim it is needed.

Basically, according to some we are attempting to mess with the very DNA of the sport.

Now, the FIA's Safety Director, has essentially put the issue in stark black and white, insisting that F1 cars only need to look dangerous rather than be dangerous.

Whilst fans, along with drivers are thankful for the many improvements carried out over the years, especially in the 22 years since Ayrton Senna's death, it is widely believed that this latest move will carry the sport over the precipice towards a time when cars are driven remotely.

"That we are aware that accidents like this can take drivers' lives and we are aware of a solution, then I think it is incumbent on us to do our best to make sure we can protect drivers more," said Whiting, according to the Guardian. "I do not think there is any doubt about that."

Referring to Lewis Hamilton's claim that he is aware when he steps into an F1 car that he is taking a risk, and that it is a risk he, and his colleagues are willing to take, not to mention that it is the danger that attracts fans, Whiting said: "I take his point, but there will always be risks.

"If you are driving a car that quickly. When you look at them on track, it's not until they go off the track that you realise how fast they are going and just what damage can be done. Cars will still look dangerous. Our job is to try and make them look dangerous without being dangerous.

"You only have to have an accident to see that it is dangerous," he continued. "There is nothing better than to see a driver get out of an incredibly damaged car like we saw with Fernando Alonso (in Melbourne). Everyone expects it.

"When you saw Kubica's accident in Canada a few years ago, somehow you just thought he was going to get out of it, and we want to improve the chances of that happening while the spectacle is still there."

Referring to the two devices, the Halo and aeroscreen, he confirmed, according to Autosport, the many more tests need to be carried out and that the permitted to for a driver to get out of his car may need to be increased.

"That will be quite an important factor," he admitted. "Looking at the actual opening, I can't see any difference between the two. We did a jump out test on Daniel (Ricciardo) on Thursday to make sure. He was only doing one lap but you never know what might happen. We wanted the comfort of knowing that he was able to get out of the car in the required time and he was and that will only get better.

"Teams will develop systems to make it easier for it to get out and if we eventually needed to add a couple of seconds to the time required to get out, that would be a small price to pay for the added protection for the driver's head.

"Some drivers have said to me this is not F1 and won't be F1 any more," concluded Whiting, "but then other drivers, most drivers I would say, are in favour of it, in fact very, very insistent upon it being introduced.

"Do you ever stop with safety research? Look at road cars 20 years ago some of the things you see on road cars now you would not believe would be necessary but they are now normal."

LATEST NEWS

more news >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

Click to go to the main galleries section

READERS COMMENTS

1. Posted by TheHillsHaveEyes, 05/05/2016 14:46

"The screen option look fine on first impression, however what about when it rains, the driver uses the back of his glove to clear what he can from his visor, how will he clear the screen when he won’t even be able to reach it.

The Halo is a little better than the screen in wet wether as it will cut through rather than collect the rain, but then you have the restricted vision on the Halo with the single mount in front of the driver, this in my mind has a bigger safety issue in the event that the car turns over as it will limit the drivers escape.."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by ryanhellyer, 05/05/2016 10:12

"I've always liked the idea of closing in the cockpits, but I'd rather see them give it an extra year, maybe two, just to make sure they get it right. F1 has an annoying tendency to mess with the rules, and I'd rather see them guinea pig this thing in testing, not in a live championship.
"

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by bfairey, 05/05/2016 9:56

"Radio controlled cars here we come."

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Motorsport-fan, 05/05/2016 9:12

"The screen is the way to go and there appears an unstoppable movement now, the looks of the thing is the main concern, lets not forget it was bolted onto a car not designed for it, I am sure once fitted on a chassis built to take it, it will look a lot better."

Rating: Neutral (0) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by nonickname, 04/05/2016 17:17

"Can't wait for these axxe hxlxs to start on Motogp."

Rating: Negative (-1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Whiting: F1 cars only need to look dangerous

LATEST NEWS

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

POST A COMMENT

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

Share this page