When it came to light in summer 2011 that subscription service Sky Sports would take over the live broadcasts rights in the UK to Formula One from 2012 there was uproar. Fans were outraged at having to pay to watch F1 for the first time and some teams were worried that the reduction in viewers could damage their sponsorship rates.

Two years down the line and the teams must be thanking their lucky stars because as, Pitpass' business editor Christian Sylt reveals in the Daily Telegraph, the Sky deal helped to boost F1's profits by 24% to a record £262.3m last year. As Sylt also points out in US motoring magazine Autoweek, this gave the teams more prize money than ever before as they took home a massive £462.4m in 2012. As can often be the case, it looks like the only real losers were the fans.

F1's largest shareholder, the private equity firm CVC, certainly didn't lose out as it took home a dividend of £532m from cash in the bank and the proceeds of a loan refinancing during 2012.

Accounts due to be lodged with Companies House this week show that revenues rose 12% to £840m at Delta 2, the highest-level F1 parent company which files publicly available financial statements. Costs increased 7% to £577.7m leaving £262.3m of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA).

Despite repeated complaints that the teams aren't paid enough, the amount they received last year increased 8% on 2011 and was 202% higher than in 2007 when they only got a percentage of the income from broadcast fees rather than a cut of F1's profits. Although the prize money is not distributed evenly between the teams, the top ten each get a basic fixed payment and this alone came to £17.2m in 2012.

The prize money payment is F1's biggest single cost. It even exceeds the £65.3m in bank interest paid by Delta 2 last year on the £1.4bn of debt used by CVC, to buy the business in a leveraged buyout in 2006. However, despite the large size of the prize money payment, F1 is insulated against risk as the amount reduces if its profits go down. The main exception to this is that the top three teams, Ferrari, McLaren and Red Bull Racing, have the right to pull out if operating profits fall below £440m. Last year they hit £725.7m so there seems to be little chance that F1's biggest stars will leave the sport.

The vast majority of Delta 2's revenue comes from fees paid to host and televise F1 races. The accounts state that "despite the continued effects of the downturn, growth was noted in a number of the Group's income streams. Underpinning the performance were... the benefits of revised TV rights arrangements in the UK."

Sky is one of the highest-paying broadcasters and its fee for the live rights to all F1 races, practice and qualifying sessions comes to an estimated £44.3m annually. It took over the rights from the BBC and is believed to be paying 10% more than its predecessor. The BBC now only broadcasts nine of the races live but pays an estimated £20.3m annually giving Delta 2 two bites of the cherry in the UK.

The companies responsible for F1's two other main business areas of trackside advertising and corporate hospitality are based in Jersey so do not file publicly available accounts. It is understood that they generated a combined £246m last year taking F1's combined turnover to $1.6bn.

Revenue in 2012 was also boosted by the return of two races which gave a total of 20 on the calendar and made it the biggest since the championship began in 1950. Last year saw the addition of The United States Grand Prix after a five year hiatus and the return of the race in Bahrain which was cancelled in 2011 due to the civil uprising in the country.

Again, it is another development which some teams voiced concerns about at the time but on reflection they must be thanking their lucky stars that it went ahead.

Hindsight's a wonderful thing, isn't it?

LATEST NEWS

more news >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

Click to go to the main galleries section

READERS COMMENTS

1. Posted by Darvi, 08/10/2013 10:48

"I am not a Sky subscriber and I do miss the live action - but I don't miss the lamentable Brundle who, on the BBC, was well past his sell by date IMHO. The coverage on the Beeb is enjoyable, particularly Gary Anderson while the Edwards/Coulthard combo works well. Better still, I don't have to suffer the padding put in by Sky to justify their fee, although the recent Pastor Maldonado cooking episode must have been a "must watch" for all those hard core Formula 1 fans!"

Rating: Positive (2) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by JackTheCat, 08/10/2013 10:39

"@xoanon:

All those who moaned about the Sky deal did so becuase they are basically freeloaders who expect everything for free. They are probably exactly the same people who watch downloaded movies and TV programmes ripped off Torrent sites and generally expect to pay nothing for others' hard work.

Sky F1 is fantastic value for money and if any of the teams are struggling because of this deal (and I don't believe that is the reason at all) then blame the fans who are too tight to spend a few quid to watch their favourite sport, not Sky!"

Rating: Negative (-3) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by xoanon, 08/10/2013 9:34

"2012 unique viewers in the UK were down 22%, and look likely to be further down in 2013 due to the continuing Sky deal, and this has led to a significant drop in AVE exposure for team sponsors, so much so that many teams are in financial trouble, Lotus have seen a drop of over 19% in revenue.

You can spin the Sky deal all you like but if it had been good for ALL the teams, over 50% of them wouldn't be in financial trouble.

Fans complain about Pay Drivers, but why do you think they're needed by so many teams? Because of the the drop in real revenue they're suffering due to the loss of unique viewers caused by pay wall deals."

Rating: Positive (1) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by The Rumble Strip, 07/10/2013 19:30

"There’s no doubt that thanks to Sky, coverage of F1 is now better than it ever has been.

Although one can understand an initial reluctance to pay a monthly fee, to have a dedicated channel to the sport means that the service it provides is unparalleled

Whilst both ITV and BBC continued the good work and in some ways even raised the bar from what their predecessors had broadcast, Sky has taken this to a whole new level with full detailed coverage of all races, the showing of various support series and an opportunity to relive the past.

Money well spent.
"

Rating: Negative (-2) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Jonno, 07/10/2013 12:55

"All this money floating around and yet Lotus, a top 4 team, still struggles to pay it's top driver. I hear CVC recently took home $700m. I can only guess what Bernie got.

"

Rating: Positive (2) Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

BSkyB deal boosts F1 profits

LATEST NEWS

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

POST A COMMENT

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

Share this page