Q: A question to you all; the FIA has introduced measures to save costs this year such as two-race engines and fewer sets of tyres per driver per weekend. Have you saved money?
Mario Illien: Obviously the notice for the change in the rules for this year were relatively late and apart from this, we have to develop a new engine, a V8 for next year, so overall the cost for this year will be up compared to last year. If you would have stability and maintained what we have this year, sure the cost would have been reduced because we are using less engines than we did last year.

Otmar Szafnauer: Very similar for us as well. The regulation change was made quite late and therefore we had to embark on some re-designs which have proven to be costly, so this year we won't be saving any money.

Mattia Binotto: On our side, by doubling the mileage between 2003 and 2004, we have been able to save ten percent on our budget. I think that the trend of this year is very similar to the trend of the previous year so we are again expecting to save more or less ten percent between 2004 and 2005. The V8 engine, as Mario was mentioning, I think there will always be a time when you have to completely change a project, as we did in the past from the V12 to the V10 and in some ways that is an extra cost, but there is always a time to do that, to reduce the general performance, so now is the time simply to do that.

Pierre Dupasquier: Well it's maybe a bit different for us, because development-wise, we don't change anything, we keep working at the same pace, with the same development, the same moulds, the same machinery and everything, the same engineers, it doesn't change anything. But on the other hand, since we need less tyres for the Grand Prix, for the week, our testing has been the same, that hasn't changed anything but for the Grand Prix itself it is fairly different. We had ten used by each driver now we have four sets. It makes a significant difference, more than half. So for tyre economy, themselves, the cost - which, when you're overseas is very important, it's an important factor - yes, we save significantly in that aspect.

Denis Chevrier: We knew this winter would be very challenging, technically, so there was no point in expecting cost-saving during the winter, but we have really significant expectation in terms of saving the amount of engines we have to produce for some things as tests and races, producing less engines with absolutely brand new parts and in the end, we should match some cost-saving.

Hiroshi Yasukawa: Yes, Mr Dupasquier already explained. I agree. Basically nothing has changed with testing. But concerning teams, they do much mileage but at racing itself, we can reduce transportation and total number of tyres.

Q: A question for the two tyre manufacturers; the fact that the FIA is not going to adopt a one-tyre formula but in fact it throws it open to as many tyre manufacturers as want to come in - what are your feelings about that?
HY: I'm very happy and I'm pleased with the FIA and I think they made a very good decision.

Q: Do you think other manufacturers are going to come in?
HY: I hope so.

PD: I don't know if we can hope that more manufacturers are going to come in but we strongly fought the idea of a single tyre manufacturer since it doesn't make any sense. We like to understand, we like to work, we like to develop, we like to race and producing 20,000 tyres in the winter time and shipping them by DHL doesn't make sense to us, and it's not what we like in Formula One. Yes, we do it in other disciplines but it's not the spirit that we understand the way Formula One should go, so we are very happy with that decision, as long as it is still the decision.

Q: A question now for the engine manufacturers; most of your engines have now done two races. What have you discovered when you've opened up those engines, has it been a nasty surprise or has it been pretty much as you expected?
DC: Yes, it's easy to give an answer. It was not a surprise that the engines that we fitted into the back of the cars in Melbourne would have to do two Grands Prix. We worked hard for the complete winter for that. We significantly tried to be harder on the dyno than we are in race events and what we've seen at the end of this second Grand Prix in a row was in accordance with our expectations, so it's very challenging technically but most of the other competitors succeeded as well, but our engines were in good condition.

MB: On our side, I have to say that there have not been any big surprises. It's true that racing is not always as testing or testing on the dyno by the fact that you are doing all the total mileage in six days, something that you are not normally experiencing during the winter testing. On the other side I have to say that generally, looking at all the teams, we have not done a lot of mileage, even on our side, we had an engine change for Michael in Australia, we didn't finish the race with Rubens, so we haven't achieved all the mileage. I have to say that for Ferrari, there was also the experience with Sauber's engines, which was very useful, so we analysed a total of four engines, and by the end no big surprises, everything was expected.

OZ: Yes, unfortunately we had the engine problems at the last Grand Prix and at the first Grand Prix we strategically didn't finish the race. But no, nothing that wasn't expected after we'd done the mileage that is required for two Grands Prix with the engine. We think we've overcome our problems of the last Grand Prix and hopefully two races from now we will look inside and not find any surprises.